Nick Mamatas ([info]nihilistic_kid) wrote,
@ 2004-03-22 12:20:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Check out the middle of THIS list, punk
I'm sure many of you have read the Salon article about being a midlist writer. Like most Salon articles, it bobs and weaves around its subject without ever actually ever landing a knockout blow. The author, "Jane Austen Doe" (pseudonymous as to "protect" her "career") is too chockful of hubris to see her own role in the development of the problems she faces, problems which had they been described to 99.99999% of the people who have ever lived would be understood only as a fairly ridiculous utopian fairy tale.

Anyway, Doe takes $150,000 for her first novel (about five times higher than a real midlist advance) and it flops. Thus, nobody wants to make a gift of another $125,000 to her for mysterious reasons that she just can't figure out. She does recover nicely, and ghostwrites a celebrity book that becomes a bestseller, almost certainly earning her another $150,000. Oddly, she then tries to sell a collection, even though the rule of thumb is that collections will only sell to a subset of one's audience for novels. Of course, nobody acquires it. Under her own name, her second novel commands only $10,000 and she blows some dough on a publicist; eventually she manages to sell a subsequent novel for $80,000 but Doe still must face the shame and embarrassment of not being so well-known that the folks she buttonholes on airliners spontaneously orgasm just from sitting next to her.

Like many authors, she has totally contradictory ideas of how publishing works, including making the secondhand arguments that "[t]oday's editors can't afford a single flop" and "[h]ardcover publishers lose money on most of their titles and depend greatly on a few bestsellers... ." Well, which is it, sunshine? Clearly, the only one truly surprised that Doe's first novel lost money was Doe herself.

She also trots out the ancient canard that publishing is now a business but wasn't back in the Glory Days of immediately before she began to publish. Lovecraft made similar comments in his many letters to Donald Wandrei in the late 1920s, btw.

Ultimately, Doe publishes several books over a ten-year period, gets a lot of money and a lot of accolades, but must nonetheless suck it up and take on the dreaded day job in order to exist in the manner in which she has become accustomed. This is a very different reason than the ones inspiring most people's day jobs, which involves stuff like not being homeless and dying drooling blood on the bad side of town.

Doe's "confessions" are nothing of the sort. She can't conceive of taking too high an advance as a risk, or trying to sell a collection after a novel flopped as a bad move, or her books simply not connecting with many readers because of her choice of subject matter or style, her failure to turn windfalls into consistent income, or anything else she did to land her in the degraded state she's in now: getting out-of-the-blue phonecalls from potential employers in an economy with relatively high unemployment. Heavens!

Because she is convinced that you'll be aggrieved by her tale of five and six-figure advances and her inability to get on the Today show, Doe wrote a sidebar explaining what you can do to help her out. Her suggestions include "thinking" and getting politicians to do the same. Good luck with that one, Bartleby. Doe also wants us to support funding for the arts, presumably because without a handy completion grant or two she may have had to get a day job years before, leaving her open to the danger of coming across a Negro laborer and falling into a terrible swoon from the nervous shock.

I have few suggestions not for readers but for midlist writers I would like to impart:

1. Don't be a fuckaninny with money. When you get a great big check, don't do stupid shit with it. Even if you do "deserve" a vacation, most vacations are stupid and wrong. Your memories will not last a lifetime, but your arguments with your spouse about who said what to whom in Paris and whether that cafe was really in a Vienna anyway will. Further, nobody wants to see photos of you and your ugly husband squinting and showing off your peeled-potato white knees in front of the Acropolis. Never, and I mean, NEVER, buy a car you have to make payments on to afford. That would be a bad bet if cars didn't depreciate, and they do, and damn quickly. This goes double for SUVs, unless you need to transport a brace of retards to the zoo every day as part of your community service for writing a derivative novel.

2. Remember that publicity is only a barely rational economic act. If publicity worked any less well or any less often, publishers wouldn't bother. A heavily-hyped book can flop too, as Jayson Blair's thrilling nosedive teaches us all. Most authors see publicity as a black box. Poor money into it, and ten times the money pops out the other end. Nuh-uh. In a supersaturated media environment, no amount of exposure is guaranteed to work, and some qualities of exposure work better than others. The publisher of Letters To Wendy's told me once that he sold a lot of copies by hitting indie rock magazines with review copies. The glowing notice about the book in Rolling Stone, however, moved ZERO extra copies. Large audience, but the wrong audience.

3. Learn to add and subtract.

4. Look at per-word rates. Need a quick $5000? Well, you can spend months writing a 75,000 word media tie-in novel, or a few afternoons writing three feature articles that earn a buck a word.

5. Take what you do seriously. Don't write a book because you think "it would make a great movie." Don't experiment in genres you don't like and aren't familiar with because, having failed to master suggestion 3, you have decided that category romance, SF, or even more hilariously, horror, pays better than contemporary American realism and that as it is "formula" fiction it must be easy to write. The vision of being happily ensconced writing a novel every 20 months until you die is the negation of the drive and fate-daring that got you published in the first place. Does the planet really need eighteen novels about the stuff you did the day before yesterday, especially when by definition the latter seventeen of them will be about a novelist writing a novel about the stuff he did the day before yesterday? Yeah, I think we have more than enough too.

6. The following do not necessarily make you wise: getting cancer, growing up po', growing up wealthy but in a former imperial holding, having a miscarriage, marrying well, paying $275 per square foot for an apartment, extramarital affairs, being very well-read, having a blog with lots of readers, living out in the woods and peeing in a creek, worrying aloud about how authentic you are, declaring that you'll leave the country if a Republican is elected, and giving birth to an autist.

Hope that helps and happy writing!


Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(81 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Man.
[info]deep_bluze
2004-03-22 09:34 am UTC (link)
You know, I thought about it for a few minutes and could easily see this article (which I didn't read, and won't because the subject of mid-list author whining frankly bores the crap out of me) being written by a dozen people I know on one level or another.

I remember a couple fo times wanting to shake such an author and say, WRITE BETTER! Jesus, it's always been a business. If you can't write what people want to buy, whose fault is that?

And your description of said author also shows how so many younger folks come onto the scene with completely skewed ideas - they read that drivel and believe it must be so, because said driveler has made sales.

Anyway, thanks for insuring I'll never take the time to fill out the little membership thing you have to fill out to read the article.

D

(Reply to this)


[info]mrissa
2004-03-22 09:38 am UTC (link)
Does the planet really need eighteen novels about the stuff you did the day before yesterday, especially when by definition the latter seventeen of them will be about a novelist writing a novel about the stuff he did the day before yesterday?

But what's worse, to my way of thinking, is a second (or third or nth) novel about a creative writing instructor who has already published a novel and doesn't know what to write next but is frightfully witty and charming in his/her own mind, and gets laid, often spectacularly. And then the jacket bio says, "Author X teaches at Y Regional College." BLEH. Enough already.

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]nihilistic_kid
2004-03-22 09:44 am UTC (link)
Oh yes, especially when the prof ends up balling a "brilliant" college freshman who wears cardigans and argyle socks, has a short bob haircut ("Like Louise Brooks," I told her, or my wife when we first met I found myself thinking. "Who is Louise Brooks," she asked me. I could only roll over and pretend to sleep.) and many pseudo-interesting things to say about the very same sonnets the author wrote his dissertation on.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]marlowe1, 2004-03-22 05:55 pm UTC (Expand)

[info]affinity8
2004-03-22 09:38 am UTC (link)
I read that Salon article at about 1 a.m. this morning and was like, duh, you accepted a $150K advance on your first book, and thought your career would automatically get better after that? The bits about reneged deals and disappearing publicists was interesting, but them's the breaks in any business. It doesn't lessen the frustration, of course.

I was completely unimpressed with the sidebar advice, but thought it dovetailed with the post by Avenue Victor Hugo re their closing this spring.

Mostly I tried to figure out who the writer was. Annie Lamott? I figured maybe she changed the bit about her son/daughter and started to research her publishing career, but come on. There are better things to do at that time of the morning.

Re the media tie-ins, apparently the advances on the Trek books have dropped to the $1500 range. They've cultivated a new crop of writers through their Strange New Worlds anthology contests (I've never gotten in, but a classmate of ours from Strange Horizons NJ just did) and can pay them a pittance because they're newbies.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]jonquil
2004-03-22 12:06 pm UTC (link)
Anne Lamott has more humor and self-deprecation than that. Besides, she's written a couple of nonfiction works that sold well.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]jwitchbaby, 2004-03-24 10:17 pm UTC (Expand)

[info]blergeatkitty
2004-03-22 09:40 am UTC (link)
Nick, did you ever know that you're my hero?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]nihilistic_kid
2004-03-22 09:47 am UTC (link)
Glad to be of service!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]nobodys_baby
2004-03-22 09:48 am UTC (link)
oh. nick. i. love. you.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]nihilistic_kid
2004-03-22 09:52 am UTC (link)
I got the assfuck icon and everything. Truly you must love me!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]stoat
2004-03-22 09:56 am UTC (link)
I'm sure many of you have read the Salon article

around 8:30 am, i glanced at the headline, thought, "nah, i'll just read whatever NK will post later," and moved on to a different site.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]wilhemina
2004-03-22 11:27 am UTC (link)
ha ha I did that too...

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]sirhc_warrior
2004-03-22 10:05 am UTC (link)
Doe still must face the shame and embarrassment of not being so well-known that the folks she buttonholes on airliners spontaneously orgasm just from sitting next to her.

the actual reason people strive to be authors is revealed.

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]cmdrhobbes
2004-03-22 10:08 am UTC (link)
NK is still seeking for this state, too.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]matociquala, 2004-03-22 11:43 am UTC (Expand)

[info]multiplexer
2004-03-22 10:26 am UTC (link)
Confession -- I got to the line:

And, thanks to the rules that govern publishing today, nothing I've ever done for a living -- housecleaning, data entry, creating campaigns for big-name, cutthroat ad agencies, full-time motherhood -- has been as hard on me as being a writer.

And then I promptly stopped reading. Writing is more difficult than housecleaning? You're SHITTING me. And, oh yes, you wrote while you brought your no doubt beautiful children in the world, so we have to admire how brave you are to balance motherhood with writing! Give that woman a grant!

Of course it's a business and of course it's hard. Christ. And all I could think was -- Salon paid her about $50 for that sentence.

Nick, I find your LJ to be infinitely more helpful and enlightening than 10,000 of these whining articles on Salon.

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)

Concerto in G for World's Tiniest Violin
[info]srallen
2004-03-22 10:41 am UTC (link)
That bit reminded me of a temp gig I had a couple years ago. It was boring, heads-down data entry but it paid pretty well, better than unemployment. And there was this girl who spent every free moment of conversation bitching about how this was her worst job ever and absolutely hated it and how she really should have been doing (insert list here)...

I'm not about to enter the "worst job ever" competition here, but I've got to say that working maintenance in an athlete's dorm makes every data entry temp job I've had seem like paradise.

My heart bleeds. What next, an anonymous slam poet complaining how he didn't get on Def Poetry Slam and the Barnes & Noble's poetry section keeps shrinking?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)(Expand)

Re: Concerto in G for World's Tiniest Violin - [info]marlowe1, 2004-03-22 05:59 pm UTC (Expand)
Re: Concerto in G for World's Tiniest Violin - [info]bohemiancoast, 2004-03-23 01:08 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]sirhc_warrior, 2004-03-22 11:44 am UTC (Expand)

[info]witchchild
2004-03-22 10:39 am UTC (link)
I am going to take this moment to point out wh you have just summed up the reasons for me NOT being a writer. Well, a writer of fiction anyway. Maybe someday I will publish articles on obscure myths for Parabola or something.

(Reply to this)


[info]daigor0
2004-03-22 10:40 am UTC (link)
very nice post. thank you.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]nihilistic_kid
2004-03-22 11:03 am UTC (link)
Your welcome!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)(Expand)

nick knows contracts, not contractions - (Anonymous), 2004-03-22 01:27 pm UTC (Expand)
Re: nick knows contracts, not contractions - (Anonymous), 2004-03-23 01:46 am UTC (Expand)

[info]antonstrout
2004-03-22 10:57 am UTC (link)
Goddammit, there goes my novel about eating at Taco Bell and then writing my rent check and whining about being poor! Maybe if I throw in the Ancient Ones I can get a six figure deal...

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]nihilistic_kid
2004-03-22 11:01 am UTC (link)
Well it didn't work for me, pal, but you can give it a shot.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]epi_lj
2004-03-22 11:30 am UTC (link)
I have no idea who you are, so I should presumably be unbiased. Or something. A friend, however, linked me to your rebuttal after we were, frankly, complaining about the article in question. The thing that strikes me most is that your rebuttal was both potent and entertaining. I smiled while reading it. (Contrary to internet tradition, I rarely laught out loud while reading the printed page. Perhaps I need to attend a new age workshop on that.) For nearly the entirety of my reading of the original article to which yours is addressed, I kept thinking, "No wonder your books aren't flying off the shelves." The article was horribly unfocused. We'd had half a dozen interludes before we reached any sort of "meat" (as a vegetarian, I feel the need to use unnecessary quotation marks there, as if it in some way redeems something or, you know, matters). The spontaneous block quotes were annoying, and rarely had anything to do with the specific bits of text in which they were anchored.

What struck me most is that this person seemed to be writing for two things: Love (of the author, not of writing) and money. (I was kind of squicked by their effusive tangents on the love shared between author and editor, and the lack of said love elsehwere in life.) I don't have a huge amount of sympathy with someone who writes solely for love and money, and doesn't succeed. I know that lots of people write purely for money, and even the greatest authors need to make ends meet, but they don't go whining about it, or they do so out of my earshot. There seem to be better ways to get money and better ways to get love (and a few good ways to get both). If you don't love the actual writing, then the rest seems ill-advised.

(Reply to this)


[info]cloudscudding
2004-03-22 11:43 am UTC (link)
I was pointed this way by the [info]seriouswriters community. After reading that article, I was all set to go on a rant. Then I read your post, which covered all the points I was going to and a few I wasn't (no. 6), and now I don't have to! So thanks for a) sparing me the effort, and b) entertaining me.

(Reply to this)

\m/
[info]ebess
2004-03-22 11:54 am UTC (link)
In other news, I love you.

*smooch*

(Reply to this)


[info]misia
2004-03-22 11:59 am UTC (link)
Dammit, Nick, you beat me to it. That'll teach me to be spending the better part of the day actually churning out words for pay.

Yet again, you have my applause.

(Reply to this)


[info]suricattus
2004-03-22 12:05 pm UTC (link)
The best summation to date of this article has been 'get over yourself, bitch." But yours comes a close second.

The sadness is that somewhere, someone read this, and thought it was inspirational and thoughtful and interesting.

We must find this person and kill them. Now.

(Reply to this)


[info]antonstrout
2004-03-22 12:07 pm UTC (link)
I want to hit her like a Mexican kid wants to hit a piniata

course I can't say that as I am a part of the midlist perpetuators...

*insert evil laugh here*

(Reply to this)


[info]rsheslin
2004-03-22 12:11 pm UTC (link)
Having a blog doesn't make you wise?

*furtively looks around*
*tries to remember what she's been pontificating on lately*

Uh-oh.

(Reply to this)


[info]darksylvia
2004-03-22 12:31 pm UTC (link)
Hahahaha...that was great.

*snicker*

For every good professional writer, there have to be at least ten who are wankers.

And God, do I ever agree with #6

(Reply to this)


[info]jonquil
2004-03-22 12:43 pm UTC (link)
I loved your rant. One addition to (6): Having a past or current addiction to anything.


Note from the sidebar: If you're outraged because you wish you had my problems, take a writing class from a midlist author at your local independent bookstore, start writing whatever's in your heart and head to write, and maybe soon you will.

DAMN! That's what my writing is missing -- I forgot to take a class from a midlist author! A class in entitlement and bitterness would set me right up.

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]marlowe1
2004-03-22 06:02 pm UTC (link)
And all those poor midlist authors sitting around The Writer's Loft (or whatever it's called in your town) just waiting to inject you with the drive it takes to get a $150,000 advance and run away with the money.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]nihilistic_kid, 2004-03-22 07:59 pm UTC (Expand)

[info]haddayr
2004-03-22 02:47 pm UTC (link)
Thanks, Nick. I was able to read the article so you don't have to help me out. I commented on it and your post on my lj.

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2004-03-22 03:31 pm UTC (link)
THANK YOU!!! This was exactly my response to this article. She's made by my count roughly $250,000 in the last ten years from her fiction alone, plus the money for the ghostwritten bestseller (which "doesn't count" because it doesn't have her name on it--famewhore). She strikes me as one of those people who wanted to *be a writer* but doesn't actually like to write. She's looking for some kind of validation that--gues what!--doesn't actually come from publishing a book, even a bestselling or critically acclaimed one.

And WORD that she's spending too much. Most writers I know could live off the interest of what she's earned.

Please send this to Salon!!

(Reply to this)


[info]yuki_onna
2004-03-22 05:08 pm UTC (link)
Well, shit. What's the point of me ranting about this sorry lump now?

At least I don't feel like so much of a bitch, my major response to this article being "Somebody call the waaaaaambulance."

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2004-03-22 05:10 pm UTC (link)
My god, she slapped that article together in an hour and a half, tops.

Eliani

(Reply to this)


[info]zoomardav
2004-03-22 05:20 pm UTC (link)
#6 should be expanded and put on billboards.

(Reply to this)


(81 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…