Nick Mamatas ([info]nihilistic_kid) wrote,
@ 2003-10-03 06:45:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Letters To (And From) A Young Dipshit
Tim "Money" Pratt recently offered up some advice for new writers. Jay "Jay Lake" Lake coughed up his personal rules for writing too..

So I figured I'd toss a few notes in too. I'll give away the secret right up front if you don't want to read the whole thing. Here is the secret: perspective. Always keep a sense of perspective.

1. Perhaps you are one of those writers who tweaks a spreadsheet program so that you can keep track of all your submissions, response times, and any of the comments you might get on rejection slips. Maybe you've found yourself debating what sort of paper to buy: the cheap stuff may not look as good, but the high-quality paper may send a subconscious message to the editor that you're well off and don't need the sale. If you see a big name editor or agent online somewhere, perhaps you write up a cute little comment with plenty of smilies, just to say hi and how much you appreciate the work. You may not even know why you do all these things, so I'll tell you. It's because you are a fucking twerp.

Things like paper stock and sycophantic online repartee give you a feeling of mastery, but the effect these things have on getting published are in the 0.000001% range. "But doesn't any edge count?" you may ask, and yes, any edge does, but the energy spent sweating meaningless crap can be much better spent in-story.

2. Same goes for the reverse. Maybe you've run afoul some Big Name Author online, and his dashed-off notes are full of minor copy errors. Why that's outrageous! How unprofessional! You sit there proofreading every USENET post and lj comment and nobody is buying your stuff, and this wank gets to a) disagree with you and b) doesn't bother watching his commas! One typo on a manuscript means rejection, or so you've been told, but the Big Names are getting away with murder! Why do you feel this way? Because you're an idiot. Just relax. What you're stewing over, the Big Name has probably already forgotten thanks to his hip flask and another evening sitting alone in his kitchen singing along with German beerhall songs on the shortwave radio.

3. We should also keep our perspective when looking at magazines. You know the big magazines in the genre: Asimov's, Analog, F&SF. You know they don't pay very much. You may also know that lots of "mainstream" magazines pay more. What you may not know is why. Here is why:

Nobody reads science fiction magazines.

There ya go. Nobody reads 'em. Really. Locus publishes the circulation numbers annually. It's pretty damn sad. Trade magazines for the formica sales industry have better numbers. Go to a newsstand sometime and pick up any other magazine you like. Bronze Confessions. Cleveland Monthly. Foreclosure News. Pro Wrestling USA Presents: Fighting Females. You know what all these magazines have in common? More people read them than read science fiction magazines. LOTS more. So don't sweat it. The pressure in your rectum may collapse when you get into F&SF for the first time (I've never been) but the world certainly won't. Just look at the magazines, enjoy the stories, write stuff they might like, and send it in on any reasonable paper stock. There's no conspiracy or secret handshake involved, and do you know why? Because it wouldn't be worth the effort to set one up. The big-time digests are a few years away from being scrapped so that the paper can be used to create another Bible Astrology Crossword magazine.

4. Cons. People say that cons are a great place to go to to network, make connections, and to put your best professional foot forward. You should dress nicely, act appropriately, and leave the manuscripts at home. The last is true, nobody wants to drag your lame book home with them. The rest, not so much. Cons are good for one thing and one thing only: to meet 700lb women who think wearing chainmail bikini tops, hippie skirts, and fanny packs together makes for an acceptable evening outfit. You should go to cons to have fun. The best way to have fun is to ignore the pros entirely and just oggle at the oddities of human nature who congregate to these things. Dress nicely? As long as cheese doodle dust isn't all over your ridiculous mountain man beard, you'll be in the top quartile of fashion. Did you shower that week? Excellent, you're ahead of the game.

If you are a writer you may be asked to attend a con as a panel participant. This is meaningless. Do it if you'd like, but being a con guest or panel participant is in no way an accolade. If you're on a panel, it's probably only because the guy who was going to run a demo on how to remove semen stains from a human-sized otter outfit got sick after eating at Arby's every day for a week. Just go to your panel, don't hype whatever crap you're selling too much, stay on topic, and if you're seated next to some giant blowhard panelist, don't argue with him, just fuck around by making little jokes.

5. The book trade. You may have heard that there used to be whole bunches of SF book publishers in New York, and now there are only a few. This is true. It doesn't matter. Remember, keep the perspective. One, selling a book isn't a lottery, they don't choose from a random selection of manuscripts. Read what you want to write and write what you want to read. And look beyond.

In horror, people regularly wet themselves over the thought of being published by Leisure Books. Leisure Books' base advance for a first-time novelist is $2000, money that can be made by selling two short stories to slicks, or by writing a few short stories and flogging reprints, or hell, by writing a single article and selling it pretty much anywhere. Why do horror people wet themselves? Because they are insane. Even SF magazines laugh at horror magazines. Ain't nobody reading horror. That's changing slowly, but that's the way it is right now.

SF is generally a middling concern of major publishers. However, there are other ways to get a book published. I don't mean ebooks or vanity POD publishers or any of that crap, I mean indie presses like Night Shade, Ministry of Whimsy, Prime, Carrol & Graf, Four Walls Eight Windows, etc. Not all SF has an exploding planet on the cover. If your stuff is literary enough to annoy Dave Trusdale, try marketing it as a mainstream novel. You can have a perfectly acceptable career as a writer without the rocketship spine.

6. Lots of writers have an associated hobby. They like to discuss their writing style and writing process with other writers. They like to read books on writing and advice by other writers on how to write. They like to go to writing workshops and look at one another's stories. These are all fine things as long as one keeps one's sense of perspective. In much the same way being an accomplished masturbator will not make one a legendary lover, spending a lot of time on this stuff won't make you a better writer. That doesn't mean you shouldn't do it if it is fun and relaxing, just like wankin' it is. Just avoid people who see metawriting conversations as the key to success in the same way you would avoid someone who jerks off constantly as a means of practice for that great day when they finally have sexual relations.

7. Putting out a little chapbook or something can be fun. That is all it can be. Have fun with it. Don't complain that it cost you a lot of money or that nobody bought it or that everything is so unfair. Doing a little zine or a chapbook is a hobby, even if a Big Name Author ends up sending you material for hip flask-related reasons. People who skydive as their hobby know better than to complain about the high cost of parachutes. You must also know better.

8. Who is a Big Name? Well, for the most part, there aren't any. The people you spontaneously orgasm over are probably unknown to the vast majority of humanity. When I was a kid, I'd occasionally see Isaac Asimov on tv, talking about outer space or something as part of a news show. You don't see that anymore. Why not? Because Asimov is dead. So when something happens, like the space shuttle blowing up, tv segment producers think about calling an SF writer, check their Rolodex, see the black line through Asimov's name, and then say "Eh, fuck it. We won't have a science fiction guy."

The person who is the "science fiction guy" gets to be the real Big Name. Everyone else isn't one outside of the genre bantustan. Inside the genre bantustan, you know who the Big Names are. What you now need to know is that they don't matter. You should have a perspective that looks beyond the razorwire fences of the field. That way you'll be able to measure both your successes and failures properly: by knowing that both generally mean nothing.


(Post a new comment)


(Anonymous)
2003-10-03 10:40 am UTC (link)
Funny, but mostly worthless advice. Still, funny.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]nihilistic_kid
2003-10-03 10:43 am UTC (link)
What sort of paper stock do you recommend?

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]jactitation
2003-10-03 10:50 am UTC (link)
No one reads SF? Good, I'll stick to sociology then, where I can feel like at least I get something out of being published but having no one read it!

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]nihilistic_kid
2003-10-03 10:54 am UTC (link)
No one reads the magazines. Mostly it's just part of the decline of short fiction generally.

The books do better.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]jactitation
2003-10-03 10:56 am UTC (link)
It's exactly the same in sociology. But you get raises per article, basically. (Well, per clump of articles.)

(Reply to this) (Parent)

actually...
(Anonymous)
2003-10-03 10:55 am UTC (link)
Whenever I see a science fiction writer on TV these days, it's usually David Brin.

--Jon

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: actually...
[info]nihilistic_kid
2003-10-03 10:58 am UTC (link)
Yeah, but who watches C-Span 7 at 3AM.

Actually, do you see him as the "science fiction guy" or as a privacy wonk?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: actually...
(Anonymous)
2003-10-03 11:29 am UTC (link)
Hmm. Now that I think about it, it is usually privacy stuff. But they always mention he's a SF writer, and they usually tie in the whole Big Brother/1984 angle (that's probably why they do mention the SF).

I also saw him on Discovery once, talking about aliens & the SETI program, but that was quite a while ago.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]smeehrrr
2003-10-03 11:14 am UTC (link)
Great post, but it needs some kind of concluding paragraph. I mean, it just ended abruptly right before I was about to spurt. Bastard.

(Reply to this)


[info]rsheslin
2003-10-03 11:38 am UTC (link)
Brilliant. Absolutely brilliant. I happen to be a strong believer in the philosophy that Life is far too important to take seriously.

Writing's fun. Sometimes people give me money for it. But anyone who bases his or her entire self-image on whether or not a certain genre-specific BNA acknowledges his or her existence, well, sounds like that person could use a bit of perspective.

(Reply to this)


[info]cargoweasel
2003-10-03 11:42 am UTC (link)
What I wanna know is how can I as an author write a science-fiction story, but have it released as mainstream 'literature' by a small press with tremendous indie cred, and reviewed in all the big magazines and hailed as genius by people and critics who have probably never read a science fiction novel in their lives, so it's all new to them? It'd be like I've discovered some vast and amazing literary field, utterly untouched. I would of course put in some long digressions about my dysfunctional family, because that is the only real acceptable mainstream literary topic, but I could couch it in science fiction terms.




(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]radiumhead
2003-10-03 07:36 pm UTC (link)
I think i get what you're saying.

Art Speigelman (Maus, The New Yorker) is the cartoonist version of this phenomenon.There are a ton of cartoonists who are betetr than him, in every way, but for some reason critics and society people think he "transcends" comics.

I don't know how someone would do it, though..maybe it's luck, timing? i don't know.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2003-10-04 03:57 am UTC (link)
No, no--that's backwards. Write a science fiction story about a dysfunctional family, but couch it in mainstream literary terms: a story that sf readers know is an sf story, but the publishers and reviewers all miss it.

What could be more fun than that?

--Philip Brewer

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]theuglyvolvo
2003-10-03 11:48 am UTC (link)
I'm commenting just for the sake of commenting ;o)

But it was an enjoyable and informative post.
Thanks.

(Reply to this)


[info]monslucis
2003-10-03 12:26 pm UTC (link)
speaking of german beerhall songs that the Big Names listen to...
my friend Meg has a CD that has many tracks of 1 german drinking song (whose lyrics consist of--translated--"lots of beer! lots of beer! gluck gluck gluck") and each track is set to a different style of music

(Reply to this)


[info]ebess
2003-10-03 03:36 pm UTC (link)
Okay, this is the post of the day, definitely.

Thank you very much for posting this. I laughed. I cried. It was much better than CATS. I'm going to read it again and again.

xo,
E. Bess

(Reply to this)


[info]glaucon
2003-10-03 04:21 pm UTC (link)
great advice, and more or less exactly what I keep trying to tell people about slam poetry.

(Reply to this)


[info]radiumhead
2003-10-03 07:32 pm UTC (link)
Isn't ray Bradbury still alive? he'd count as a big name, wouldn't he?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]nihilistic_kid
2003-10-03 07:47 pm UTC (link)
Ah, that's a good one. He tends to eschew the spokesperson role so that's why I forgot him.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]rsheslin
2003-10-03 08:05 pm UTC (link)
Unless you live in SoCal, in which case he seems to pop up every few months, making appearances or speeches on something or other.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]cargoweasel
2003-10-03 07:48 pm UTC (link)
Arthur C. Clarke still gets dredged up from time to time.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]nihilistic_kid
2003-10-03 07:51 pm UTC (link)
Ah, but he's totally out of it. At some recent event where he appeared holographically, he started going on about the vegetation on Mars.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]citabria
2003-10-03 08:03 pm UTC (link)
A friend linked here, to my great enjoyment! I think you've managed to summarize everything that should be taught at every "writer's workshop" -- but never is. People take themselves too damn seriously sometimes.

But people -- go ahead and spring for the 100% cotton rag paper. Even though your manuscript's probably going to be rejected (I'm just talking probability, here, so no offense), you'll at least have the satisfaction of knowing that you gave the editor the pleasure of caressing good paper for as long as it took hir to review it. ;)

(Reply to this)

workshops, not circle jerks
(Anonymous)
2003-10-04 09:23 am UTC (link)
"They like to go to writing workshops and look at one another's stories....In much the same way being an accomplished masturbator will not make one a legendary lover, spending a lot of time on this stuff won't make you a better writer."

simply attending writer workshops is *absolutely* no guarantee of improving as a writer - unless those in attendance can read insightfully and give you solid advice. any young dipshit (me included) is better served by jumping into a bare-knuckled workshop attended by at least one professional, intelligent writer, rather than journaling (eww!), blogging (double eww!), or only letting your brother or d&d group read your stories. "writing for yourself" will get you nowhere.

and if you're bright, you'll know when to *stop* attending workshops.

otherwise, dead-on advice, nick. (though i'd add: be careful that judgement of sf/f conventioneers doesn't turn into false superiority. that dude with cheese-doodle dust in his beard might actually be the editor you've been trying to sell to for months.) -barth

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: workshops, not circle jerks
[info]nihilistic_kid
2003-10-04 09:36 am UTC (link)
Absolutely, Barth!

And let's not forget that Cheese Doodle Beard, even if not an editor, can be a great friend and wonderful person. The point is not to get all wrapped up in dressing professionally, because dress is not the measure of a writer, or a person.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2003-10-04 11:38 am UTC (link)
glad to hear you say that, nick (he said, wiping ranch flavor doritos out of his moustache.)

(Reply to this)

Sex for One
(Anonymous)
2003-10-06 09:20 am UTC (link)
"...being an accomplished masturbator will not make one a legendary lover..."

Don't let Betty Dodson hear you say that.


Dan "constantly posting comments in other people's livejournals as a means of practice for that great day when I finally start a blog of my own" Percival

(Reply to this)

on cons
(Anonymous)
2003-10-06 10:49 pm UTC (link)
For the record: as a direct result of working at cons to make connections in the business, I've sold two novels, been asked to do a media tie-in, been invited to be in anthologies, and made contacts in the comics and online game fields. Cons can be very useful. It's also useful to avoid looking down your nose at the people who attend cons; although it's nice to feel superior, if you do sell they're the ones who will read you.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: on cons
[info]nihilistic_kid
2003-10-06 10:56 pm UTC (link)
Did you do that by being "professionally dressed neo-pro #87669591459431" or just by being yourself?

Also, anyone who orients themselves toward a con-going audience is going to end up out of print right away. You have to break beyond the hardcore audience to sell a reasonable number of copies.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: on cons
(Anonymous)
2003-10-07 06:37 am UTC (link)
I did it by drinking beer and hanging around with people who I by and large found interesting, and talking about things we were all involved in. I met writers; we talked about what we were doing; some of them said hey, this or that editor might like that; I followed up. You don't have to sell your soul to try to make a living, and there's no merit badge for being sarcastically aloof.

NB: I didn't say orient yourself toward a con-going audience; I said don't look down your nose at them.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: on cons
[info]nihilistic_kid
2003-10-07 07:34 am UTC (link)
And I'll say this, why not? The hardcore of fandom buys stuff whether or not authors look down on them. In some cases, Ellison comes to mind, being singled out to be looked down upon becomes a badge of honor -- it gives them a story they enjoy repeating.

However, I agree that people shouldn't look down upon anyone, unless of course those people manifest a desire to be looked down upon, through ultra-defensiveness or reverse snobbery. The point is not to gladhand or be smarmy. Be yourself.

As far as being myself, I've heard the advice to never be argumentative on message boards. I'm known for being particularly argumentative on message boards because that is an aspect of my personality I see no reason to dilute. However, I'm also known for being right, which is what attracted the attention of both Prime and Night Shade, two publishers I've sold books to in the last six months. Even though a lot of the fans on the board essentially despise me, for every seething nerd there's someone who knows what I'm about. So far I've seen members of both groups buy the collection too.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…